header-logo header-logo

09 March 2007 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 9 March 2007

Tenancy deposits scheme - landlords beware, The Court of Appeal reports, Danger in the TCC, Payments in - the end

LET EARLY FOR EASTER

The tenancy deposit scheme (see www.communities.gov.uk/tenancydeposit) arrives on 6 April 2007 with the Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004), ss 212–214 and Sch 10 due to be brought into force along with the Housing (Tenancy Deposit Schemes) Order 2007 (draft SI 2007/5748). The scheme will catch any tenancy deposit—money intended to be held by the landlord or otherwise as security for the performance of any obligations of the tenant or the discharge of any liability—in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy (it is reckoned that £695 is the average amount handed over) where the deposit is received on or after 6 April 2007.

Spot the difference

There are three approved schemes: a custodial scheme, where tenants pay landlords and landlords pay the deposits into the scheme, run by the Deposit Protection Service, which is free to landlords and letting agents; and two insurance schemes, where tenants pay deposits to landlords which they or agents retain with either

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll