header-logo header-logo

02 September 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7900 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 4 September 2020

Possession stay by a majority; Possession notices upped to six months; Contempt smartened up; Revising your budget

Back to sleep—just

How could they? We got you all excited last time over the imminent expiry of the possession stay and then, three days before lift-off, the Lord Chancellor directs the rule committee to make rules to extend the stay further until 20 September 2020 (see ‘Civil way’, NLJ 14 August 2020). The committee met the next day, considered the ‘extremely unusual nature and timing’ of the direction, as the Master of the Rolls has put it, and—by a majority!—concluded that it was bound to follow the direction. The extension has been cursed—I mean, blessed—by the Civil Procedure (Amendment No 5) (Coronavirus) Rules 2020 (SI 2020/889) and CPR PD 55C has been consequentially amended (124th update). There has been no interference with the lifting of the stay on enforcement of writs and warrants of control on 23 August 2020. The Coronavirus Act 2020 (Residential Tenancies: Protection from Eviction) (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/914) extend the increased residential possession notice period

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll