header-logo header-logo

29 January 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7872 / Categories: Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 31 January 2020

Distressing for landlords

The lessor’s common law self-help right of distress was replaced by the commercial rent arrears recovery scheme (CRAR). This was introduced by the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 with the Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/1894) poking their noses in. The scheme is only available in relation to commercial premises. At least seven days’ rent must be unpaid.

Common law distress amounted to a waiver of the right to forfeit. But what of the exercise of CRAR? Over to Brar and another v Thirunavukkrasu [2019] EWCA Civ 20132 where enforcement agents took control in the lessee’s shop on behalf of the lessor for £10,533 of rent and fees which the lessee stumped up three days later. Six days after that, the lessor purported to forfeit. The lessee brought proceedings claiming a declaration as to the unlawfulness of the forfeiture and damages. The Court of Appeal ruled that the lessor had waived their right to forfeit. CRAR in principle amounted to an unequivocal act confirming the lessor’s decision to affirm the continuation of the lease, just

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll