header-logo header-logo

29 January 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7872 / Categories: Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 31 January 2020

Distressing for landlords

The lessor’s common law self-help right of distress was replaced by the commercial rent arrears recovery scheme (CRAR). This was introduced by the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 with the Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/1894) poking their noses in. The scheme is only available in relation to commercial premises. At least seven days’ rent must be unpaid.

Common law distress amounted to a waiver of the right to forfeit. But what of the exercise of CRAR? Over to Brar and another v Thirunavukkrasu [2019] EWCA Civ 20132 where enforcement agents took control in the lessee’s shop on behalf of the lessor for £10,533 of rent and fees which the lessee stumped up three days later. Six days after that, the lessor purported to forfeit. The lessee brought proceedings claiming a declaration as to the unlawfulness of the forfeiture and damages. The Court of Appeal ruled that the lessor had waived their right to forfeit. CRAR in principle amounted to an unequivocal act confirming the lessor’s decision to affirm the continuation of the lease, just

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll