header-logo header-logo

20 May 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil Way: 22 May 2020

COVID-19

Spot the liar It is not possible to say as a generality whether a witness is telling the truth in court rather than remotely. That was the conclusion of Lieven J in the care fact-finding case of A Local Authority v Mother and others [2020] EWHC 1086 (Fam). Demeanour would often not be a good guide to truthfulness. Some people were better at lying than others and that would be no different whether they did so remotely or in court. Demeanour in court would often be more obvious to the judge but that did not mean it would be more illuminating. Might a witness be more likely to tell the truth if they were in the witness box and felt the pressure of the courtroom? This could work the other way round. They might feel less defensive and be more inclined to tell the truth in a remote hearing than when feeling somewhat intimidated in court. In the absence of empirical evidence, she could reach no conclusion on what forum was most likely to elicit the most truthful and/or revealing evidence.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll