header-logo header-logo

17 June 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Procedure & practice , Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 19 June 2020

Go low with the CFO; Possessions reparalysed; High Street lessee win; Family cases to surge.
Flexible tenancy shock; Big financial remedy changes

Nothing special

The special and basic account rates with the Court Funds Office (CFO) have been savaged—have you ever tried savaging a peanut?—as from 1 June 2020. In line with commercial sector practice, the decision to do this was announced on 1 June 2020. As an emergency measure, the special account rate reduces from 0.5% to 0.1% and the basic account rate from 0.1% to 0.05%. The Bank of England base rate now sits at 0.1% to which the CFO rates have responded. However, the reduced rates compare unfavourably with what is on offer from NS&1: for example, 3.25% on its Junior ISA, 0.90% on its Direct Isa and 1% on its Direct Saver.

Any claimant’s advocate who joins a remote protected party settlement approval appointment deserves to be muted and drenched in cheap sanitiser if unarmed with some decent investment proposals away from the CFO (see ‘Civil way’, NLJ 27 March 2020).

The special account reduction impacts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll