header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
18 June 2009 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 19 June 2009

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

CFO rates hit rock bottom; Ecstasy for tolerated trespassers; Master loses Rolls; Reduced assets

 

 

 

Civil way

CFO rates hit rock bottom; Ecstasy for tolerated trespassers; Master loses Rolls; Reduced assets

Not so special

Court Funds Office’s special account (mainly for investment of funds for children and others who lack capacity) and basic account (mainly for funds held on deposit during proceedings) saw their rates halved to 3% and 2% respectively on 1 February 2009. The reduced rates were halved again on 1 June 2009. For the innumerate, this means the special rate is down to 1.5% and the basic rate to 1%. Litigation friends may have a go at seeking to persuade the court to allow them to invest themselves. The special account change is of more than academic importance to personal injury pleaders as the rate is utilised in calculating interest on special losses in personal injury claims.

TA TA to the TT

The tolerated trespasser (TT) (a status described as “conceptually peculiar, even oxymoronic” by Lord Neuberger in Knowsley Housing Trust v White [2008] UKHL

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll