header-logo header-logo

02 August 2018
Issue: 7804 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 3 August 2018

Meal tickets; Look, no divorce!; Service charge fights

STARTER

The 156 paragraphs of Moylan LJ’s judgment in Waggott v Waggott [2018] EWCA Civ 727, [2018] All ER (D) 44 (Apr) kept the wife’s meal on the table but its duration was reduced from joint lives to a term of circa four and half years with a bar. The husband’s estimated income for the hearing year was £3.7m and a substantial proportion of it was bonus related. On appeal, the wife went after a share of the future bonus income on the ground that it was a matrimonial asset which she was entitled to share as with any other asset. The bonus earning capacity had been built up during the marriage and was therefore the product of marital endeavour. Nice one but it got nowhere in the Court of Appeal. Treating the bonus as such would fundamentally undermine the court’s ability to effect a clean break.

MAIN COURSE

Did the Supreme Court seize the opportunity to kill off ‘meal tickets for life’ in Mills v Mills [2018] UKSC 38, [2018] All ER (D) 107

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll