header-logo header-logo

05 July 2018
Issue: 7800 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 6 July 2018

MoJ payback; orders! Orders!; credit mire; silently unmeritorious.

FEES OVERCHARGE

The County Court has been overcharging on the issue of certain CPR Pt 8 stage 3 protocol low-value personal injury road traffic and employers’ and public liability claims, extracting the sweep-up ‘any other remedy’ fee of £308 instead of the usually lower money claim fee where, for example, a paper form claim within the £3,000 to £5,000 range would cost £103 less. Staff have been given revised guidance and the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) informs us that it will be setting out details of a refund scheme in due course. Catering for cases where the inflated fee has been settled by the unsuccessful party should present a nice headache.

A reminder to court staff on the issue of the revised MoJ guidance will not go amiss along with a certificate of value to be added to the Pt 8 claim form corresponding to the relevant fee band. And a reminder to you, dear readers, that where you have procured a limitation stay of a claim under CPR PD 8.B 16 (and some district judges

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll