header-logo header-logo

25 May 2018
Issue: 7794 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 25 May 2018

  • Worthless divorces.
  • Witness chat disaster.
  • First-class appeals.
  • Happy tune for whistlers.

FAMILY WAYS

Ooops The FD President issued interim guidance on 23 April 2018 on the procedural path to be followed by judges in relation to dummy decrees. A number of cases have been brought to his attention where decrees nisi and absolute have been granted notwithstanding that divorce petitions have been presented within one year of the marriage or before the expiration of the two year separation period under s 1(2)(d) or (e) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. In the former situation, the decrees are null and void and the defect cannot be cured by petition amendment (and any financial remedy order will surely fall). A remarriage would be invalid and any children born of it would be illegitimate. In the latter case, the President suggests that the same consequences would follow except that ‘it may be possible, if the facts warrant it, to amend the petition to plead one of the grounds set out in ss 1(2)(a) or (b).’ If a new petition is presented, then the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll