header-logo header-logo

11 May 2018
Issue: 7792 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 11 May 2018

  • New Insolvency PD in force.

  • CPR PD changes.

  • Court of Appeal’s latest instalment.

COUNTY COURT SHOCK

The Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (SI 2016/1024) came into force on 6 April 2017 (see 'Civil way', NLJ 10 March 2017). But no new PD. In appreciation of the urgent need to issue one, it was published around one year later and came into force on the same day, to wit 25 April 2018. It reflects the 2016 rules and recently decided cases, changes to the CPR (particularly in relation to the Business and Property Courts PD) and specifies the revised arrangements for the distribution of insolvency business across the different judicial levels.

Here’s the Big One (para 3.7). Apart from uncontested or contested statutory demand applications, unopposed creditors’ winding up petitions and unopposed bankruptcy petitions (now labelled as ‘local business’), County Court hearing centres not located at a District Registry have been robbed of insolvency jurisdiction. They are required to transfer to a County Court with insolvency jurisdiction which is located at a District Registry on the same circuit to deal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll