header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 12 September 2008

Procedure & practice

Objections to a company's registered name (because it is the same as one in which the objector has goodwill or is so like such a name that it is likely to mislead) are to be determined under the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), ss 69 and 70 which come into force on 1 October 2008.

The provisions are aimed at the opportunists who have in mind merger talks between New Law Journal and Penthouse and might otherwise be quick off the mark to register New Law Penthouse Ltd and possibly Civil Way Naked Ltd for good measure. Companies House will not deal with the opportunist but only with “too like” or “same as” registrations.

And so it is that the Company Names Adjudicator Rules 2008 (SI 2008/1738) come into force on the same date. The rules are modelled on the Registered Designs Rules 2008 and, indeed, members of the Registrar of Trade Marks Tribunal will be doubling as the first adjudicators on company names. They may make an order to direct the company to change its name. If it fails

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll