header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 12 September 2008

Procedure & practice

Objections to a company's registered name (because it is the same as one in which the objector has goodwill or is so like such a name that it is likely to mislead) are to be determined under the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), ss 69 and 70 which come into force on 1 October 2008.

The provisions are aimed at the opportunists who have in mind merger talks between New Law Journal and Penthouse and might otherwise be quick off the mark to register New Law Penthouse Ltd and possibly Civil Way Naked Ltd for good measure. Companies House will not deal with the opportunist but only with “too like” or “same as” registrations.

And so it is that the Company Names Adjudicator Rules 2008 (SI 2008/1738) come into force on the same date. The rules are modelled on the Registered Designs Rules 2008 and, indeed, members of the Registrar of Trade Marks Tribunal will be doubling as the first adjudicators on company names. They may make an order to direct the company to change its name. If it fails

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll