header-logo header-logo

13 April 2018 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 13 April 2018

  • Ah ha, it’s Aarhus.
  • Stay or leave after a s21?
  • Dilemma for solicitors.

CAP TO FIT BETTER

To get through to the quarter-finals of the CPR Brainbox of the Year contest, define an Aarhus (it’s in Denmark) Convention Claim, without hesitation, deviation or repetition. It is an environmental judicial review or statutory appeal to which the convention applies and to which we are signed up and this was devised to see that the public has access to proceedings which challenge public authorities and that these proceedings are ‘not prohibitively expensive.’ Aarhus proceedings forced themselves into the first 2017 amendment CPR (see 'Civil way' NLJ 24 February 2018) as we had not done very well on the ‘not prohibitively expensive’ bit. Now these proceedings have forced themselves into the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2018 (SI/2018/239) comprised within the 95th update which came into force on 6 April 2018 and speak of nothing else. To blame is the aptly named Dove J for his judgment in RSPCB and others v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor [2017]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll