header-logo header-logo

13 April 2018 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 13 April 2018

  • Ah ha, it’s Aarhus.
  • Stay or leave after a s21?
  • Dilemma for solicitors.

CAP TO FIT BETTER

To get through to the quarter-finals of the CPR Brainbox of the Year contest, define an Aarhus (it’s in Denmark) Convention Claim, without hesitation, deviation or repetition. It is an environmental judicial review or statutory appeal to which the convention applies and to which we are signed up and this was devised to see that the public has access to proceedings which challenge public authorities and that these proceedings are ‘not prohibitively expensive.’ Aarhus proceedings forced themselves into the first 2017 amendment CPR (see 'Civil wayNLJ 24 February 2018) as we had not done very well on the ‘not prohibitively expensive’ bit. Now these proceedings have forced themselves into the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2018 (SI/2018/239) comprised within the 95th update which came into force on 6 April 2018 and speak of nothing else. To blame is the aptly named Dove J for his judgment in RSPCB and others v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor [2017]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll