header-logo header-logo

23 February 2018 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 23 February 2018

HMRC antidote; Hug a claims management co.; 94th CPR update

 

LAX ON TAX

You have missed the deadline for getting in your 2016–17 tax return or paying your tax? Let’s see if we can help with more than a cursory nod of thanks to the judges of the tax chamber. For the avoidance of doubt, HMRC do not lose every time. Just quite a bit. Incidentally, you can now make a tax appeal on line at www.gov.uk/tax-tribunal. Come this spring, you may be invited to participate in the video hearing pilot for tax appeals for which ‘the majesty of the courtroom will be upheld.’ Bow to the web cam. More next time.

It was the computer what did it The determination to impose a penalty for the late filing of a company tax return was invalid because it had not been made by a flesh and blood tax officer as required by s 100(1) of the Taxes Management Act 1970. It appeared that the HMRC computer was programmed to run checks shortly after the due date for filing and,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll