header-logo header-logo

23 February 2018 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 23 February 2018

HMRC antidote; Hug a claims management co.; 94th CPR update

 

LAX ON TAX

You have missed the deadline for getting in your 2016–17 tax return or paying your tax? Let’s see if we can help with more than a cursory nod of thanks to the judges of the tax chamber. For the avoidance of doubt, HMRC do not lose every time. Just quite a bit. Incidentally, you can now make a tax appeal on line at www.gov.uk/tax-tribunal. Come this spring, you may be invited to participate in the video hearing pilot for tax appeals for which ‘the majesty of the courtroom will be upheld.’ Bow to the web cam. More next time.

It was the computer what did it The determination to impose a penalty for the late filing of a company tax return was invalid because it had not been made by a flesh and blood tax officer as required by s 100(1) of the Taxes Management Act 1970. It appeared that the HMRC computer was programmed to run checks shortly after the due date for filing and,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll