header-logo header-logo

14 March 2025 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8108 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way , CPR , Fees
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 14 March 2025

Sue soon; CFO not so special; party wars at the TCC; latest CPR PD update; neighbourly land grabs

BEAT THE HIKE

Subject to the small irritant of parliamentary approval, some 171 civil, family and tribunal etc fees will be increased for issue on or after 1 April 2025. Issue before then and clients will be much impressed. The majority of fees will be up by an inflationary 3.2%. In the civil world, they include possessions and enforcements; the beloved N244 general application on notice which will cost £313 a throw; and the trial fee (note to HMCTS: it is no longer called a hearing fee) which will cost an extra £159 on the multi-track (and presumably intermediate track as well, although HMCTS does not expressly say so) and £74 on the fast track. No change for small claims. They have sneaked in a £4 rise to £19 for the issue of a certificate of satisfaction, which my calculator tells me is an increase of 26.66%. Perhaps an April Fooling?

Over in family, an application for divorce, nullity or civil partnership

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll