header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 26 September 2008

Procedure & practice

The mean deem

The deemed date of service of a claim form under r 6.7 is irrebuttable. It could even be on a Sunday when there are no postal deliveries. Or it could be on a date after which service was effected. So tough if, say, a claim form is deemed served outside the four-month period for service when it was actually served within it—especially if the claim is statute barred. Amendments to r 7.5 require despatch, ie posting, leaving with or collection by the relevant service provider, rather than receipt of the claim form within four months (“before midnight on the calendar day four months after the date of issue of the claim form” which should lead to some mind boggling arguments about the precise time at which the claimant shoved his hand into the postbox and whether his wristwatch may have been slow). The defendant's time for acknowledging service and filing a defence will then depend on the date of deemed service.

The business of service

A standard period for determining the date of deemed service of a claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll