header-logo header-logo

27 January 2017
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 27 January 2017

PI claims: keep out!; Master Kay’s room & How to lose a £43K deposit

RANT

It may be inappropriate but I fancy I can escape LexisNexis disciplinary action upon using the c word. So here goes. Compulsory insurance. Yes, the Motor Vehicles (Compulsory Insurance) Regulations 2016 (SI 2016/1193) which came into force on 31 December 2016 raise the amount of cover for motor insurance damage to property by £200,000 to £1.2m. Happily, most policies already cover for in excess of the new minimum figure. If any policy covers for less, then the insurer must now effect an increase.

No doubt the scripts are being extended for insurance staff who negotiate renewal premiums. “I’m afraid retired judiciary are regarded as a bad risk, Steve, and we’ve got these new regs which means higher property damage cover.” Steve won’t let them get away with it. The government consulted on raising the limit and were told by the industry that few £1m property damage claims were made and that they did not think the increase would lead to any significant change in premiums.

There’s another development, though.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll