header-logo header-logo

27 January 2017
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 27 January 2017

PI claims: keep out!; Master Kay’s room & How to lose a £43K deposit

RANT

It may be inappropriate but I fancy I can escape LexisNexis disciplinary action upon using the c word. So here goes. Compulsory insurance. Yes, the Motor Vehicles (Compulsory Insurance) Regulations 2016 (SI 2016/1193) which came into force on 31 December 2016 raise the amount of cover for motor insurance damage to property by £200,000 to £1.2m. Happily, most policies already cover for in excess of the new minimum figure. If any policy covers for less, then the insurer must now effect an increase.

No doubt the scripts are being extended for insurance staff who negotiate renewal premiums. “I’m afraid retired judiciary are regarded as a bad risk, Steve, and we’ve got these new regs which means higher property damage cover.” Steve won’t let them get away with it. The government consulted on raising the limit and were told by the industry that few £1m property damage claims were made and that they did not think the increase would lead to any significant change in premiums.

There’s another development, though.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll