header-logo header-logo

15 April 2016
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 15 April 2016

Costs budgeting pain eased; Charging order and attachment work off to CCMCC; Possession enforcement tricks; Bankruptcy goes online & Court fees up in a blink

IT’S CPR TIME

The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2016 (SI 2016/234) (the AR), a raft of PD changes and a bellyful of forms all masquerade as the 83rd CPR update and came into force on 6 April 2016. The update is more earth moving than usual.

Costs budgets You will find that these budgeting changes are rejoicing rather than resigning events but they only apply to proceedings commenced on or after 6 April 2016. The AR on multi-track costs management now effectively forbid completion of anything but the first page summary of precedent H where the value of the claim as stated on the claim form is less than £50,000 (so don’t certify the value at not exceeding £50,000 unless you suffer from costs managementitis). As before, you stick to the first page if budgeted costs do not exceed £25,000. Costs management is now disapplied not only where the court otherwise orders (don’t forget that one) and in relation to litigants in person

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll