header-logo header-logo

23 October 2015
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 23 October 2015

How to reject, consumer style & “Where does that sweet DJ sit?”

CONSUMERS ALRIGHT ACT: SECOND DOLLOP

Goodbye Now the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015) (see “Civil way”, NLJ, 9 October 2015, p17) gets exciting: well, more exciting. The Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SGA 1979), s 11 right to reject within a reasonable time (and a full refund) is replaced for consumer sales (but not for digital content) with a short-term right which is generally 30 days from delivery or earlier transfer of ownership but for perishable goods, substitute any shorter period before which perishing would occur. Time stops running if the consumer—they have no obligation to do so—requests or agrees to repair or replacement. The parties can agree to an extension (which might be useful if the trader is denying liability and the consumer wants the goods to be expertly tested or the consumer who fears that the manifestation of a defect may take longer than 30 days and wishes to preserve the right to a short-term rejection beyond 30 days may seek an extension on the 30 days as an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll