header-logo header-logo

07 May 2014
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 9 May 2014

Children and Families Act 2014 commencement

The provisions of s 11 of the Children and Families Act 2014 (CAFA) (parental involvement) have not yet been commenced as we had anticipated.

Transitional provisions for the CAFA have been made under SI 2014/1042. Family mediation and assessment under s 10 will not apply to an application which has been received by the court before 22 April 2014 but has not been issued. Residence and contact orders already made will be deemed to be s 12 child arrangement orders. Pre-commencement date applications for residence or contact which are still in progress will be deemed to be applications for child arrangement orders. The repeal by s 17 of s 41 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and the civil partnership counterpart will only apply to proceedings issued on or after the commencement date.

Issue: 7605 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll