header-logo header-logo

22 July 2016 / Adrian Jack
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

Civil war?

nlj_7708_jack

Adrian Jack reports on the current consultation into civil appeal reform

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on important changes to the rules governing appeals to the Court of Appeal (Civil Division). They are likely to prevent over 10% of appeals being heard which would otherwise succeed.

The proposals follow increased delays in the hearing of appeals with some “hear-by” dates fixed 19 months after the date of issue of an appeal. Lord Dyson MR says the position is not “acceptable or sustainable”. The most important proposed reforms are:

  • removing the right to an oral hearing following a refusal of an application for permission to appeal (PTA); and
  • increasing the threshold for granting PTA to the Court of Appeal, but not to the High Court or within the County Court.

Oral application for PTA

The first change will affect many appeals which currently succeed. Instead of a right to make an oral application for PTA, a single lord justice will have a discretion to order an oral hearing, but the number of such hearings is likely to be small. This is a major

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll