header-logo header-logo

06 June 2013 / Cathrine Grubb
Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Civil war?

What will the removal of civil liability for breaches of health & safety legislation mean, asks Cathrine Grubb

Section 47(2) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 as it stands, provides that breaches of health and safety legislation confer a civil right of action unless otherwise stated. Section 69 of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 amends s 47 to reverse that presumption, so that civil liability will only apply where this is specifically provided for in the regulations.

This amendment was initially opposed by the House of Lords, when they voted against the changes on 6 March 2013. They subsequently backed down and approved amended proposals on 22 April 2013. The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 received royal assent on 25 April 2013. The amendment is not yet fully in force, but once it is it will apply to all cases where breach of a provision occurs after the date of commencement.

Removing civil liability will mean that claimants will be under a duty to prove a case in common law negligence for their claim to be successful. At common law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll