header-logo header-logo

02 August 2024 / Steve Foster
Issue: 8082 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Civil servants & the law: when laws collide

184281
Steve Foster examines the duty of civil servants to obey the law—but which one?
  • The Civil Service Code requires civil servants to comply with the law—but in certain circumstances, such as implementing a minister’s decision to remove a migrant to Rwanda, this duty is not clear cut.
  • This article examines recent decisions that shed light on our legal system and constitution, and their relationship with international law and accepted principles of constitutionalism.

What happens if a civil servant is asked to perform an Act, but that Act is inconsistent with international law and the decision of an international court? The answer might lie in the civil servant’s contract, but if that says that they must comply with ‘the law’, then we are no further ahead. Alternatively, we might need to look at our constitutional system, asking whether a minister has the legal power to issue the order, and what happens when that legal power is inconsistent with international law.

A recent decision of the High Court (R (on the application of FDA) v Minister for the Cabinet Office

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll