header-logo header-logo

30 May 2014
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Civil procedure—Time—Extension of time

Hallam Estates Ltd and another v Baker [2014] EWCA Civ 661, [2014] All ER (D) 163 (May)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Justice Jackson, Lord Justice Lewison and Lord Justice Christopher Clarke, 19 May 2014

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, has given guidance on changes to the CPR in respect of applications to extend time.

Imran Benson (instructed under the Direct Access Scheme) for the claimants. Jonathan Lewis (instructed by Griffin Law Ltd) for the defendant.

The claimants brought proceedings for defamation. Their action was dismissed in 2012, and they were ordered to pay costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed. The judge also ordered the claimants to pay £15,000 on account by 1 June 2012. The claimants paid part of that sum in time, but not the full amount until early October 2012. The defendant’s bill of costs totalled £86,500. She had previously indicated that it would be £72,600. The claimants’ points of dispute were to be served by 14 May 2013. The claimants asked for a 21 day of extension of time

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll