header-logo header-logo

29 February 2008
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CIVIL LITIGATION

R (on the application of Strickson) v Preston County Court [2007] EWCA Civ 1132, [2008] All ER (D) 269 (Feb)

In exceptional circumstances, a litigant may be able to establish a proper case for judicial review to challenge the decision of a circuit judge in the county court, on the ground of jurisdictional error or procedural irregularity of such a kind as to constitute a denial of the claimant’s right to a fair hearing.

A distinction may be drawn between a case where the judge simply gets it wrong, even extremely wrong (wrong on the law, or the facts, or both), and a case where the judicial process itself has been “frustrated or corrupted” (this marking the truly exceptional case).

This may include cases where the court embarks upon an inquiry which it lacks power to deal with, or fails altogether to enquire or adjudicate upon a matter which it was its unequivocal duty to address.

It also includes substantial denial of the right to a fair hearing, and may include cases where the lower court has acted in complete disregard of its duties, and cases where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll