header-logo header-logo

11 January 2021
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil Justice Council shares recommendations for guideline hourly rates

35134
The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has published its recommended guideline hourly rates for solicitors, along with points for consultation
The recommendations were produced by a working group led by Mr Justice Stewart, which began seeking evidence in August 2020 (check). The rates are a guideline figure for a reasonable charge per hour for work on a case, and provide a starting point for judges when considering costs. They are banded according to geographical location (London 1,2,3 and National 1,2) and experience of practitioner (Grade A-D).

Recommended increases vary from (London 1) £512 (25.2%) for Grade A to £186 (34.8%) for Grade D to (National 2) £255 (26.78%) for Grade A to £126 (13.5%) for Grade D.

Stewart J’s report notes that future reviews should take into account ‘changes in working practice brought about by new technology, the sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic and the HMCTS reform programme’.

The guideline hourly rates have not changed since 2010―previous recommendations made by a costs committee chaired by Mr Justice Foskett were not taken up by the Master of the Rolls in 2015 due to a lack of responses from law firms.

Richard Miller, head of justice at the Law Society, said: ‘Guideline hourly rates for solicitors have not been changed in over ten years and were long overdue a review.

‘Revised rates would give both solicitors and their clients greater clarity about costs and we look forward to responding to the consultation points raised in the report. Although this report has been carried out as a standalone piece of work, it will be important to consider these changes in the context of other civil justice reforms including the Ministry of Justice’s work on fixed recoverable costs and the wider HMCTS reform programme.’

Association of Costs Lawyers chair Claire Green said: ‘It is unarguable that the GHRs need to be increased after a decade-long freeze.

‘Deciding on new rates is no easy task. The working group describes its proposed increases as ‘modest’ and if nothing else that will hopefully aid their approval should they be the final figures recommended to the Master of the Rolls.

‘The report also makes some welcome tweaks to the regime, most notably by re-categorising London 1 and London 2 bands to reflect the type of work done rather than a firm’s postcode, and ensuring that every part of the country outside the capital is specifically allocated to a band.

‘The working group notes that, back in 2015, the then Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, accepted the recommendation that suitably qualified costs lawyers should be eligible for grades B and C. Implementation of this, and recognition of the value of our work, is now long overdue.’

The consultation on the recommendations is open until 31 March 2021. See: bit.ly/3sgwFUv.

 

Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll