header-logo header-logo

11 January 2021
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil Justice Council shares recommendations for guideline hourly rates

35134
The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has published its recommended guideline hourly rates for solicitors, along with points for consultation
The recommendations were produced by a working group led by Mr Justice Stewart, which began seeking evidence in August 2020 (check). The rates are a guideline figure for a reasonable charge per hour for work on a case, and provide a starting point for judges when considering costs. They are banded according to geographical location (London 1,2,3 and National 1,2) and experience of practitioner (Grade A-D).

Recommended increases vary from (London 1) £512 (25.2%) for Grade A to £186 (34.8%) for Grade D to (National 2) £255 (26.78%) for Grade A to £126 (13.5%) for Grade D.

Stewart J’s report notes that future reviews should take into account ‘changes in working practice brought about by new technology, the sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic and the HMCTS reform programme’.

The guideline hourly rates have not changed since 2010―previous recommendations made by a costs committee chaired by Mr Justice Foskett were not taken up by the Master of the Rolls in 2015 due to a lack of responses from law firms.

Richard Miller, head of justice at the Law Society, said: ‘Guideline hourly rates for solicitors have not been changed in over ten years and were long overdue a review.

‘Revised rates would give both solicitors and their clients greater clarity about costs and we look forward to responding to the consultation points raised in the report. Although this report has been carried out as a standalone piece of work, it will be important to consider these changes in the context of other civil justice reforms including the Ministry of Justice’s work on fixed recoverable costs and the wider HMCTS reform programme.’

Association of Costs Lawyers chair Claire Green said: ‘It is unarguable that the GHRs need to be increased after a decade-long freeze.

‘Deciding on new rates is no easy task. The working group describes its proposed increases as ‘modest’ and if nothing else that will hopefully aid their approval should they be the final figures recommended to the Master of the Rolls.

‘The report also makes some welcome tweaks to the regime, most notably by re-categorising London 1 and London 2 bands to reflect the type of work done rather than a firm’s postcode, and ensuring that every part of the country outside the capital is specifically allocated to a band.

‘The working group notes that, back in 2015, the then Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, accepted the recommendation that suitably qualified costs lawyers should be eligible for grades B and C. Implementation of this, and recognition of the value of our work, is now long overdue.’

The consultation on the recommendations is open until 31 March 2021. See: bit.ly/3sgwFUv.

 

Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll