header-logo header-logo

01 September 2017
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Civil judicial co-operation post Brexit

Family and civil lawyers have welcomed government calls for a cross-border civil judicial co-operation framework post Brexit

Under current reciprocal arrangements, a decision made by a court in the UK can be enforced in other EU Member States, enabling citizens to enforce orders made by the civil and family courts on commerce, trade and family matters such as child custody and maintenance.

After Brexit, the UK will no longer be part of this arrangement with EU Member States. Lawyers had warned of the uncertainties that families and businesses with international links might face.

However, the government said last week that it will ‘seek to agree new close and comprehensive arrangements for civil judicial cooperation with the EU,’ in its position paper, Providing a cross-border civil judicial cooperation framework.

Andrew Langdon QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said the position paper ‘shows that the government has been in listening mode when talking to the Bar Council and others on this crucial topic... However, the devil will be in the detail’.

Daniel Eames, chair of family lawyers group Resolution’s International Committee, said: ‘Cross border family law for intra EU-UK cases—whether divorce, children or financial—requires reciprocity.

‘Without reciprocal rules, there can be no legal certainty in treatment with all the ensuing complications, delays and potential costs for families and children or local authorities undertaking their child protection function.’

Ed Crosse, partner, Simmons & Simmons, said the paper confirms the UK government’s commitment to re-sign the 2005 Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. ‘As so many commercial agreements contain exclusive jurisdiction clauses, this is an important statement from the UK government, which should provide comfort to commercial parties,’ he said.

Issue: 7759 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll