header-logo header-logo

29 October 2009 / Jonathan Pratt
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Company , Commercial
printer mail-detail

City trends

Jonathan Pratt provides a statistical analysis of recent trends in City litigation

Every year, the Ministry of Justice publishes statistics on judicial and court activity. This year’s stats are analysed in this article which:
Reviews the figures for the past decade and considers the impact of the Woolf Reforms on litigation in the City of London.

Focuses on the statistics for 2008, which were published last month, to see whether the credit crunch has resulted in a rise in litigation.

Considers the figures for the now defunct Appellate Committee of the House of Lords in an attempt to to identify any trends that will be relevant to the newly created UK Supreme Court.

The impact of Woolf 

Figure 1 below shows that the aftermath of the Woolf Reforms and the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) saw a significant reduction in claims issued in the Royal Courts of Justice (from 30,251 in 1999 to 22,634 in 2002).

The decline was most striking in the Queen’s Bench Division, where the number of claims issued went down from 10,317 in 1999 to 4,394 in 2002.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll