header-logo header-logo

05 January 2023
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

City of London Law Society—Michael Davison

Deputy CEO of Hogan Lovells to head up specialist arbitration committee

The City of London Law Society (CLLS) has established a new committee specifically dedicated to the topic of arbitration law and appointed Deputy CEO of Hogan Lovells, Michael Davison, as its first chair.

The committee brings together the City’s most esteemed practitioners in the field of arbitration to provide expert advice to the Government, lawmakers and other stakeholders on international disputes. The launch of the Committee also marks an important step for the CLLS as it works to promote the City of London as one of the most important centres for arbitration in the post-Brexit landscape.

The committee is honoured to have appointed Michael Davison, Deputy CEO of Hogan Lovells, as chair. For almost 30 years, Mr. Davison has led Hogan Lovells’ litigation, arbitration and employment practice, comprising 200 partners and 800 lawyers across around the globe. He also sits as an arbitrator, acts as a mediator, and lectures on arbitration topics.

The new committee has swung straight into action, submitting comments on 22 December to the Law Commission’s consultation on the review of the Arbitration Act 1996. The CLLS and its member firms seek to reduce as much as possible the complexity and undue costs of the Act, and to ensure London is an even more appealing choice for international actors involved in arbitration procedures.

Michael Davison said with regard to his new role: 'I am excited to have been appointed Chair of the new CLLS Arbitration Law Committee. I look forward to engaging with the excellent team we have assembled to bolster London’s position as one of the world’s leading arbitration centres. By providing a clear and consistent voice across organisations, the new committee will help us maintain our competitive edge, as other disputes hubs try to gain momentum. Our objective is to be a voice that will help modernise the arbitration system, while supporting the next generation of leaders in our field.'

Edward Sparrow, chairman of the CLLS, commented on the committee: 'I welcome the establishment of the new CLLS Arbitration Law Committee. It is a welcome addition to the ranks of CLLS committees which provide invaluable expert advice to Government, regulators and other stakeholders. Chaired by the experienced Michael Davison of Hogan Lovells, the Committee will be an important voice in promoting London as a leading centre of arbitration in the post-Brexit world.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll