header-logo header-logo

28 February 2014
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Citizenship

R (on the application of Hiri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 254 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 165 (Feb)

In deciding whether applicants for naturalisation met the requirement that they were of good character within para 1(1) of Sch 1 to the British Nationality Act 1981, the secretary of state had to consider all aspects of their character. The statutory test was not whether applicants had previous criminal convictions—it was much wider in scope than that. In order to conduct a proper assessment, the secretary of state had to have regard to the outline facts of any offence and any mitigating factors. She also had to have regard to the severity of the sentence, within the sentencing range, as that might be a valuable indicator of the gravity of the offending behaviour in the eyes of the sentencing court. The secretary of state was entitled to adopt a policy on the way in which criminal convictions would normally be considered by her caseworkers, but it should not be applied mechanistically and inflexibly. There had to be a comprehensive assessment of each applicant’s character,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll