header-logo header-logo

11 February 2021
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

CILEx shakes up legal market with solicitor-equivalent CPQ

Institute to offer solicitor-equivalent qualification for a third of the price

The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) has launched a less expensive rival to the Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE).

The CPQ (CILEx Professional Qualification) will have three levels―Foundation, which is aligned to the role of a paralegal; Advanced, for those handling cases at an advanced paralegal level; and Professional, for those who want to be CILEx Lawyers.

A CILEx Lawyer will have equivalent rights to a solicitor within their particular practice area. Eight specialisations will be available initially, including litigation, employment, private client and conveyancing.

The whole process, including training, assessment and course materials, costs £12,500. By comparison, CILEX estimates the SQE route will cost students about £40,000.

Each stage is likely to take between 18 months and two years; therefore the full qualification could be achieved in five to six years. Students with law degrees or postgraduate legal qualifications can potentially join at the end of Advanced level and qualify in two to three years. Students will combine work with study, thereby earning while they learn. Current Chartered Legal Executives can take a conversion course.

Linda Ford, CILEx CEO, said she expected an initial cohort of 400 students to start in June, subject to Legal Services Board approval at Easter time. Another 400 students are expected to start at the Advanced stage.

‘We consulted with employers in private practice, in-house and in local government about what they needed, such as commercial and legal tech skills, and tailored accordingly,’ Ford said.

‘Our view is some opportunities have been missed with the SQE and there is an issue about how accessible it actually is, when students require a degree. We also think they missed a chance to review the solicitor standard, and could have listened more to employers, for example, about the need for business and legal tech skills.’  

Issue: 7920 / Categories: Legal News , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll