header-logo header-logo

13 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

CIArb issues guidance on remote proceedings

Guidance for arbitrators on remote proceedings is now available from the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb)

CIArb launched its ‘Guidance note on remote dispute resolution proceedings’ last week. It is designed to equip both neutrals and parties with the necessary tools and techniques for conducting dispute resolution proceedings in line with social distance regulations. The authors are CIArb’s research executive Kateryna Honcharenko and research manager Mercy McBrayer, and the note includes input from eminent practitioners around the world.

It offers practical advice on how proceedings can not only continue under remote conditions but proactively adapt in ways that will ultimately be positive for the way dispute resolution is practised. Contents include factors to consider when choosing communication platforms, ensuring effective use of witnesses and experts and, crucially, safeguarding confidentiality. A helpful checklist is also included. The guiding principles can be applied to any dispute procedure.

Lewis Johnston, CIArb’s head of policy and external affairs, said: ‘The coronavirus social distancing measures pose a huge challenge, and we’re proud to unveil the Guidance Note on Remote Dispute Resolution Proceedings to allow neutrals and parties to operate as effectively as possible under these circumstances.

‘Disputes professionals are by nature adaptive and agile, and I have full confidence that our members will rise to this challenge. Furthermore, the ad hoc procedures and rules we offer are ideally suited to allow for the kind of flexibility that will be invaluable at this time.’

Timothy Cooke, partner at Stephenson Harwood and vice-chair of the sub-committee on witness conferencing established by the Singapore branch of CIArb in 2017, described the guidance note as ‘an indispensable point of reference that will be of practical benefit for those planning a remote hearing’. He said it ‘offers concise, practical advice’ and ‘covers a broad range of technical, logistical, legal and procedural matters and concludes with a helpful checklist of items for consideration’.

Download the new guidance note here.

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll