header-logo header-logo

13 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

CIArb issues guidance on remote proceedings

Guidance for arbitrators on remote proceedings is now available from the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb)

CIArb launched its ‘Guidance note on remote dispute resolution proceedings’ last week. It is designed to equip both neutrals and parties with the necessary tools and techniques for conducting dispute resolution proceedings in line with social distance regulations. The authors are CIArb’s research executive Kateryna Honcharenko and research manager Mercy McBrayer, and the note includes input from eminent practitioners around the world.

It offers practical advice on how proceedings can not only continue under remote conditions but proactively adapt in ways that will ultimately be positive for the way dispute resolution is practised. Contents include factors to consider when choosing communication platforms, ensuring effective use of witnesses and experts and, crucially, safeguarding confidentiality. A helpful checklist is also included. The guiding principles can be applied to any dispute procedure.

Lewis Johnston, CIArb’s head of policy and external affairs, said: ‘The coronavirus social distancing measures pose a huge challenge, and we’re proud to unveil the Guidance Note on Remote Dispute Resolution Proceedings to allow neutrals and parties to operate as effectively as possible under these circumstances.

‘Disputes professionals are by nature adaptive and agile, and I have full confidence that our members will rise to this challenge. Furthermore, the ad hoc procedures and rules we offer are ideally suited to allow for the kind of flexibility that will be invaluable at this time.’

Timothy Cooke, partner at Stephenson Harwood and vice-chair of the sub-committee on witness conferencing established by the Singapore branch of CIArb in 2017, described the guidance note as ‘an indispensable point of reference that will be of practical benefit for those planning a remote hearing’. He said it ‘offers concise, practical advice’ and ‘covers a broad range of technical, logistical, legal and procedural matters and concludes with a helpful checklist of items for consideration’.

Download the new guidance note here.

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll