header-logo header-logo

10 September 2020 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Opinion , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Choppy waters

27140
Jon Robins highlights the clashes between government & ‘activist lawyers’ over the treatment of migrants

A short video posted from the Home Office Twitter account at the end of last month blamed EU regulations for ‘allowing activist lawyers to delay and disrupt returns’ of migrants. The government had been thwarted in its plans to put 23 migrants who had arrived in the UK on small boats on a charter flight to Spain. The video, described by The Times as resembling the opening sequence of the BBC sitcom Dad’s Army with arrows indicating ‘British forces attacking Nazi-occupied Europe’, was swiftly taken down.

The idea of activism being demeaned by government as a professional flaw predictably incensed the legal Twitterati: ‘ “Activist lawyers” again? Really? Doing your job is now activism, it seems,’ tweeted the Bar Council. ‘We are wondering what an “activist Home Secretary” does.’

Matthew Rycroft, permanent secretary at the Home Office, admitted that officials should not have used the phrase; however the home secretary waded in asserting people who had arrived in the UK in small boats had no ‘legal right’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll