header-logo header-logo

Choosing the right expert

31 October 2025 / Ann Stanyer
Issue: 8137 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Wills & Probate , Health
printer mail-detail
234226
In retrospective assessments, it is essential to instruct an expert with the right qualifications for the case at hand, writes Ann Stanyer
  • The case of Parfitt v Jones underscores the importance of instructing an expert with the right qualifications—particularly medical expertise—when assessing testamentary capacity, especially in retrospective evaluations.
  • Retrospective assessments require detailed background, medical history and family context. In this case, the judge found the expert’s reasoning flawed.

The recent case of Parfitt v Jones and another [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) illustrates the importance of providing detailed instructions to your chosen capacity assessor, but also making sure that that assessor has the appropriate experience and expertise you need for the specific court proceedings.

The facts

Mrs Mary Wadge, a widow with three children, died in 2018. She signed a will in 2008, which left her share in the family home to her daughter Carolyne, various legacies and the residue divided between her son James, other beneficiaries and her grandchildren. She did not leave anything to her daughter Vicky. Carolyne sought to prove that will. Mary’s daughter

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll