header-logo header-logo

24 April 2014 / David White
Categories: Features , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

A chilling effect?

David White reflects on the decision of the Supreme Court in Kennedy v Charity Commission

Judgment has recently been handed down by the Supreme Court in Kennedy v Charity Commission [2014] UKSC 20, [2014] All ER (D) 240 (Mar) and its decision to dismiss Kennedy’s appeal will make welcome news for many public authorities. 

The facts

Kennedy, a journalist for The Times newspaper, had requested information held by the Charity Commission to investigate three inquiries it had conducted in relation to the Mariam Appeal. The Mariam Appeal was launched in 1998 by MP George Galloway following the imposition by the UN of sanctions against Iraq. In 2003, allegations were made that improper donations had become funds of the Appeal which prompted the Charity Commission to carry out three inquiries. 

The request for information was made under s 1(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000) which grants individuals a general right to request information held by public authorities. The Charity Commission, as a public authority, is obliged to fulfil any requests for information made under FIA 2000 unless an exemption applies. While FIA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll