header-logo header-logo

24 April 2014 / David White
Categories: Features , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

A chilling effect?

David White reflects on the decision of the Supreme Court in Kennedy v Charity Commission

Judgment has recently been handed down by the Supreme Court in Kennedy v Charity Commission [2014] UKSC 20, [2014] All ER (D) 240 (Mar) and its decision to dismiss Kennedy’s appeal will make welcome news for many public authorities. 

The facts

Kennedy, a journalist for The Times newspaper, had requested information held by the Charity Commission to investigate three inquiries it had conducted in relation to the Mariam Appeal. The Mariam Appeal was launched in 1998 by MP George Galloway following the imposition by the UN of sanctions against Iraq. In 2003, allegations were made that improper donations had become funds of the Appeal which prompted the Charity Commission to carry out three inquiries. 

The request for information was made under s 1(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000) which grants individuals a general right to request information held by public authorities. The Charity Commission, as a public authority, is obliged to fulfil any requests for information made under FIA 2000 unless an exemption applies. While FIA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll