header-logo header-logo

28 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family , Public , Local authority
printer mail-detail

Children suffering as cases drag on

Families and children are waiting two years to have their cases resolved, a report by the National Audit Office (NAO) has found

The report, ‘Improving family court services for children’, published last week, considers both public and private family law proceedings involving children. It found the statutory time limit for public law cases of within 26 weeks has never been met nationally since it was introduced in 2014.

As of December 2024, more than 4,000 children were in proceedings lasting nearly two years or sometimes more. Delays breed delays as evidence and assessments need to be updated, and costs grow. For example, between 2018 and 2022, average spending on legal aid for a case brought by a local authority doubled, from about £6,000 to about £12,000, mainly due to cases taking longer. The NAO assessed this as representing an annual increase of £314m in legal aid spending for these cases.

There is regional variation—Wales performs best, with averages of 24 weeks for public cases and 18 weeks for private cases. London, on the other hand, averaged 53 weeks and 70 weeks, respectively.

However, complex accountability arrangements and limited information on the biggest causes of delays make it difficult to target improvements, the NAO found.

Nevertheless, the NAO noted the pathfinder pilot currently underway in five areas has yielded promising results to date.

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, urged the government to ‘spend to save’ by investing in pathfinder courts.

‘While local authority costs increased in the pilots, direct judicial costs halved,’ Mills said. She called for ‘a much more joined-up approach’ and highlighted that one party in four out of ten cases last year was unrepresented.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘When cases are resolved quickly, fewer complexities develop and fewer court applications are needed, reducing overall costs to the taxpayer.’

Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family , Public , Local authority
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll