header-logo header-logo

01 May 2019
Issue: 7838 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Expert Witness , Fees , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Children left without experts

Fee rates leave social workers unable to afford to take on legal aid cases

A shortage of expert witnesses is putting vulnerable children at risk, a social workers’ group has warned.

The Legal Aid Agency confirmed in April that fees for reports by independent social workers will remain at their 2013 rate of £33 per hour, in its ‘Guidance on the remuneration of expert witnesses’. By comparison, legal aid rates for ‘employment consultant’ experts are £54.40 per hour, while midwives and computer experts are paid £72 per hour.

Social worker experts provide independent opinions on the best interests of a child in high-stakes cases where the family court is deciding whether the child should be removed from his or her family, be fostered or adopted, or continue to have contact with their parent. The expert will not usually be paid for more than 30 hours work including reading all the evidence, conducting interviews with all significant parties and writing the report.

According to independent social workers’ organisation Nagalro, however, many experts spend considerably more than 30 hours on each case.

Nagalro chair Sukhchandan Kaur said: ‘Many of our members, who bring with them post-graduate qualifications and tens of years of front-line experience, are left feeling that the government does not value their skills, or the work which they can do, but is still happy to take advantage of their commitment to vulnerable and disadvantaged children.

‘An increasing number are taking the sad and reluctant decision that they can no longer afford to take on legal aid cases. Others say that they are not able to undertake a reliable assessment due to the limit on the number of hours.’

In November 2018, the president of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, told delegates at the Bond Solon Experts Conference that cases are being delayed because of a national shortage of experts willing to accept cases at the prescribed rates.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll