header-logo header-logo

22 May 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Children Act 2004 Information Database (England) (Revocation) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/1278)

The Children Act 2004 Information Database (England) Regulations 2007, SI 2007/2182, came into force in 2007.

Commencement date
15 May 2012

Legislation Affected

SI 2008/912, SI 2010/1172, SI 2010/1836 amended; SI 2007/2182, SI 2010/1213 revoked


Summary

Background

The regulations require local authorities to establish an information database (the ContactPoint database) for the purposes of facilitating arrangements to safeguard children and to promote welfare.

The ContactPoint database was abolished in August 2010. The Regulations associated with it therefore have no effect and are being revoked.

Effect

The Regulations revoke the following:

The Regulations make consequential amendments to:

  • the Offender Management Act 2007 (Consequential Amendments) Order 2008, SI 2009/912, Sch 2;
  • the Local Education Authorities and Children’s Services Authorities (Integration of Functions) (Local and Subordinate Legislation) Order 2010,
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll