header-logo header-logo

09 April 2014
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Child victims could be named

Charity condemns Lord Justice Leveson's ruling

Just for Kids Law has condemned a decision this week by Lord Justice Leveson to limit anonymity protections for children in court. 

The charity says it could deter child victims and witnesses, and impede rehabilitation for young offenders. 

Leveson LJ held, in JC, RT v CPS and BBC [2014] EWHC 1041 (QB) that children previously involved in court proceedings can be named in the media after they turn 18. He called on Parliament to “fashion a solution…as a matter of real urgency”. 

He said: “It is truly remarkable that Parliament was prepared to make provision for lifetime protection available to adult witnesses...but not to extend that protection to those under 18 once they had reached the age of majority, even if the same qualifying conditions were satisfied.”

The charity’s director, Shauneen Lambe, described the decision as “damaging and concerning”.

Following the ruling, children will have less protection than vulnerable adults, who are given anonymity for life under the Youth Justice & Criminal Evidence Act 1999, she said.

“The difficulties of encouraging child victims and witnesses to come forward are well recognised, as has been reported by the NSPCC report into the Jimmy Saville scandal. 

“The BBC’s own Child Protection Policy says that children’s best interests are at the heart of everything that they do, but I am not sure children would agree. For a child, knowing that they could be named in the world’s press once they turn 18 could be a real deterrent to their coming forward.” 

 

Issue: 7602 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll