header-logo header-logo

26 October 2022
Issue: 8000 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Child law , Personal injury , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Child sexual abuse inquiry concludes

Failure to report should be made a criminal offence and the time bar removed for victims bringing civil claims, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), led by Professor Alexis Jay, has recommended in its concluding report.

The IICSA, which heard evidence from more than 7,000 victims and survivors over a seven-year period, published its final report, ‘The report of the IICSA’, last week. It made 20 recommendations to help protect children, with three recommendations as the centrepiece.

First, there should be a statutory requirement of mandatory reporting for individuals in certain paid or voluntary employments who witness it or are told about it, with a criminal offence of failure to report.

Second, a national redress scheme should be set up, with straightforward processes to provide some monetary redress where victims have been let down by institutions. Third, the report recommends the creation of a Child Protection Authority in England and Wales, with powers to inspect any institution associated with children.

Other recommendations include a cabinet-level Minister for Children, a public awareness campaign on child sexual abuse, amendment of the Children Act 1989 to give parity of legal protection to children in care, extending the disclosure regime to those working with children overseas, and removal of the three-year limitation period or time bar for personal injury claims brought by victims.

Kim Harrison, executive committee member of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) called for the proposed changes to the law to be implemented without delay.

‘Trauma, shame, mistrust in authorities, fear, and an instinct to protect their families from the stigma of abuse are just some of the very valid reasons why people hold back on speaking out, let alone take the step to seek justice,’ Harrison said.

‘For survivors to be willing finally to go through the ordeal of proving their cases only to then discover they were not quick enough to act can be devastating for them. The law needs to recognise that survivors of childhood sexual abuse are unique and almost always seek justice later than other injured people—for very good reasons.’

Current estimates suggest one in six girls and one in 20 boys suffer sexual abuse before the age of 16. The IICSA report notes: ‘There remains an incomplete public understanding of child sexual abuse, exploitation and power dynamics.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll