header-logo header-logo

28 April 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Child’s play (Pt 1)

nlj_7743_burrows

In the first article in a series of three, David Burrows examines the role which a child can play in children proceedings

  • Can a child take, or participate in, proceedings which concern his or her future?
  • How can a child make his or her own application to the court in children proceedings?
  • What does the court take into consideration if the child’s ability to conduct proceedings is in question?

In Mabon v Mabon [2005] EWCA Civ 634, [2005] Fam 366, Wall LJ stressed the need to approach questions as to a child’s involvement in court proceedings from the ‘child’s perspective’ not that of the adults involved (eg judge, parties, legal representatives). This series of three articles:

  • considers the part children can play in English family proceedings;
  • contrasts their rights in EU law; and
  • looks at the way in which in any proceedings a child’s understanding of the issues involved in the case is material to the court’s decision.

This article considers what rights a child may have to participate in court children proceedings, and how this can be done. ‘Child’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll