header-logo header-logo

28 April 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Child’s play (Pt 1)

nlj_7743_burrows

In the first article in a series of three, David Burrows examines the role which a child can play in children proceedings

  • Can a child take, or participate in, proceedings which concern his or her future?
  • How can a child make his or her own application to the court in children proceedings?
  • What does the court take into consideration if the child’s ability to conduct proceedings is in question?

In Mabon v Mabon [2005] EWCA Civ 634, [2005] Fam 366, Wall LJ stressed the need to approach questions as to a child’s involvement in court proceedings from the ‘child’s perspective’ not that of the adults involved (eg judge, parties, legal representatives). This series of three articles:

  • considers the part children can play in English family proceedings;
  • contrasts their rights in EU law; and
  • looks at the way in which in any proceedings a child’s understanding of the issues involved in the case is material to the court’s decision.

This article considers what rights a child may have to participate in court children proceedings, and how this can be done. ‘Child’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll