Dorothea Gartland analyses the concept of significant harm
The decision of the Court of Appeal in MA, SA, HA (Children by their Childrens’ Guardian) v MA, HA & The City and Council of Swansea [2009] EWCA Civ 853, [2009] All ER (D) 354 (Jul) will be of particular interest to practitioners in regard to the concept of significant harm under the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989).
As Ward LJ explains in his judgment: “This is, as I understand it, the first time this Court has had to consider when the dividing line between harm and significant harm is established.” The majority decision was to dismiss the appeal by the children’s guardian against the findings of the trial judge that the threshold had not been crossed in care proceedings and the subsequent dismissal of the care proceedings.
The facts
The parents were both from Pakistan and had arrived in the UK and sought asylum. Their claims had been refused.
While in the UK, the mother had three children and at the time of the appeal in June 2009, the eldest daughter M was four years
