header-logo header-logo

13 January 2012 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Features , Child law , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Child benefit

Michael Tringham examines the law relating to inheritance by children

A double intestacy has brought the sole beneficiary’s mother—the co-habiting partner of the deceased’s three-year-old son Rory—into the High Court as both claimant and defendant (as her son’s litigation friend). The case started with Rory’s grandfather, who died intestate in 2009. His £500,000 estate passed to his son Kieran (Rory’s father), who died seven months later, also intestate.

While Rory’s mother Ellen “nobly”, said Mr Justice Norris (Wright & Greenstreet v Gater & Wright [2011] EWHC 2881 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 153 (Nov)), made no claim on her late partner’s estate, two consequences of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (s 47) gave her cause for concern:

  • A potential £89,000 inheritance tax bill.
  • Anxiety should her son receive all the money at his 18th birthday—or if he married or formed a civil partnership before then.

She and her late partner’s brother (Rory’s uncle) sought a variation under which they and a solicitor would hold the estate upon trust for Rory until he was 30. Norris J accepted that if the intestacy rules were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll