header-logo header-logo

Chatbot & AI guidance refresh for judges

17 April 2025
Issue: 8114 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Artificial intelligence , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail
Judges, clerks and support staff have been issued with updated guidance on artificial intelligence (AI)

This replaces guidance given in December 2023. It includes a warning that AI chatbots are now being used by unrepresented litigants, and may be the only source of assistance they receive.

‘If it appears an AI chatbot may have been used to prepare submissions or other documents, it is appropriate to inquire about this, ask what checks for accuracy have been undertaken (if any), and inform the litigant that they are responsible for what they put to the court/tribunal,’ the guidance states.

Indications of chatbot or AI usage include US spelling, unfamiliar citations of cases, content that is persuasive but has obvious substantive errors, and references to unfamiliar or overseas cases.

The guidance, issued this week by Baroness Carr, the Lady Chief Justice, and other senior judiciary, also adds new sections on misinformation, bias and dataset quality, expands the glossary of AI terms and introduces Microsoft Copilot Chat for judicial office holders through eJudiciary accounts. It reassures judges that, as long as they are logged into their eJudiciary accounts, data entered into Copilot remains secure and private.

View the guidance here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll