header-logo header-logo

27 June 2019 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Charity partnerships: birds of a feather

Charities should be aware of the risks as well as the benefits when partnering with non-charities, says Bethan Walsh

  • Charities working with non-charities: the Charity Commission’s new guidance.

Working with non-charitable organisations or ‘non-charities’ can offer charities great benefits—for example, fundraising and profile-raising, to name just a couple of the more obvious benefits. But charities have to deal with the fact that this strategy also carries a number of risks, including reputation and loss of income. For example, if the non-charity is reflected poorly in the media for whatever reason, that could result in reputational issues for the charity.

Following last year’s consultation on the draft guidance, the Charity Commission has published its long-anticipated new guidance on ‘Charities with a connection to a non-charity’. The guidance sets out the Commission’s expectations for managing relationships where charities are connected to non-charities. A key motive behind the guidance is to address concerns that some links between charities and non-charities have damaged public trust and confidence in charity generally.

While the focus of the guidance is very much on being aware of and managing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll