header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017 / Paul Davidoff
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Opinion , Charities , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Charity can begin at home

nlj_7739_davidoff

Will probate disputes decline in the light of Heather Ilott’s reversal of fortune, asks Paul Davidoff

Does the recent Supreme Court decision in Ilott v Mitson [2017] UKSC 17 now mean that we cannot disinherit our adult children? The answer is now, as it was before: it depends. What we do have is more clarity on how the courts will approach a claim by a disappointed adult child.

In some European countries, children have an absolute right to a share of their parents’ estates. If a parent does not give them the minimum amount prescribed by law, the children have an automatic right to claim it. That is not the case in England and Wales. Here, we may leave our estates to whomever we wish, including charities—no one, not even our partner or children, has an absolute right to any of it.

Despite this freedom, Parliament has decreed that, in some circumstances, we ought to make provision for others and the most recent statutory rules are set out in the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependents) Act 1975 (IPFDA). It is how the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll