header-logo header-logo

A changing landscape?

How will the case of Edwards influence the future of wrongful dismissal claims? Spencer Keen & Jennifer Lee report

The law of unfair dismissal provides a remedy to employees whose termination has breached the generally accepted norms of industrial fairness set out in the Employment Rights Act 1996. On the other hand an action for wrongful dismissal provides a remedy based squarely on the law of contract. Practitioners have been advising clients about the practical effects of choosing between a wrongful dismissal case in the county court and an unfair dismissal case in the tribunal for many years. Most practitioners learn, at an early stage of their careers, the difference between the rules governing the award of compensation in both jurisdictions.

While the statutory cap on compensation for unfair dismissal has crept upwards (it is now £63,500) the rules governing the award of damages for wrongful dismissal have remained, for the most part, not only stable but also consistent with the general principles of contract law. In Gunton v Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council [1980] 3 WLR 714 Buckley J

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll