header-logo header-logo

A changing landscape?

How will the case of Edwards influence the future of wrongful dismissal claims? Spencer Keen & Jennifer Lee report

The law of unfair dismissal provides a remedy to employees whose termination has breached the generally accepted norms of industrial fairness set out in the Employment Rights Act 1996. On the other hand an action for wrongful dismissal provides a remedy based squarely on the law of contract. Practitioners have been advising clients about the practical effects of choosing between a wrongful dismissal case in the county court and an unfair dismissal case in the tribunal for many years. Most practitioners learn, at an early stage of their careers, the difference between the rules governing the award of compensation in both jurisdictions.

While the statutory cap on compensation for unfair dismissal has crept upwards (it is now £63,500) the rules governing the award of damages for wrongful dismissal have remained, for the most part, not only stable but also consistent with the general principles of contract law. In Gunton v Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council [1980] 3 WLR 714 Buckley J

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll