header-logo header-logo

A changing landscape?

How will the case of Edwards influence the future of wrongful dismissal claims? Spencer Keen & Jennifer Lee report

The law of unfair dismissal provides a remedy to employees whose termination has breached the generally accepted norms of industrial fairness set out in the Employment Rights Act 1996. On the other hand an action for wrongful dismissal provides a remedy based squarely on the law of contract. Practitioners have been advising clients about the practical effects of choosing between a wrongful dismissal case in the county court and an unfair dismissal case in the tribunal for many years. Most practitioners learn, at an early stage of their careers, the difference between the rules governing the award of compensation in both jurisdictions.

While the statutory cap on compensation for unfair dismissal has crept upwards (it is now £63,500) the rules governing the award of damages for wrongful dismissal have remained, for the most part, not only stable but also consistent with the general principles of contract law. In Gunton v Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council [1980] 3 WLR 714 Buckley J

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll