header-logo header-logo

13 April 2007 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Change of PACE

Michael Zander QC considers whether the new Home Office review of PACE is good news

The Home Office has established a fresh and fundamental review of PACE, Modernising Police Powers: Review of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. The consultation paper (CP), issued on 14 March 2007, calls for suggestions on a great variety of topics. It is difficult to know whether the prospect should be viewed with optimism or pessimism. What is the agenda driving the review? Does it portend dismantling or weakening of basic PACE structures and systems or will it lead to useful improvements? Is the consultation exercise genuine or merely a cover for changes the Home Office has already decided on?

In his foreword, the Minister for Police and Security, Tony McNulty, having lauded the safeguards in the system, writes of “bureaucratic processes and over-complicated procedures in the application of these safeguards which do not serve the best interests of the police, or the criminal justice system or, importantly, those of the victim”. This sounds like mood music heralding the dismantling of safeguards.

He writes that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll