header-logo header-logo

06 September 2007 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A change of PACE

How can the Home Office make the most of the consultation process for PACE reform? Michael Zander QC reports

The Home Office published a summary of responses to its consultation exercise on the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) on 31 July 2007.

The consultation was launched on 16 March 2007. The consultation paper, Modernising Police Powers, had nine substantive pages raising a longish list of topics and possible ideas. Views were sought by 31 May 2007.
It turns out, however, that this is merely the first stage in a lengthy process. In a covering note to the summary of responses, the Home Office stated that the fruits of this consultation would be used to guide phase 2, which would consist of “regional seminars with stakeholders and practitioners and a programme of bilateral meetings with key stakeholders”.

The aim of these meetings is “to establish the evidence for and practical benefits of change and to look at the impact of implementation and delivery”. More prosaically, this might be rephrased “the aim of the meetings is to explore these issues more fully with some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll