header-logo header-logo

21 February 2008
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection , Other practice areas , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Change of approach for computer program patents

Patents

Some computer programs can be patented, the High Court has ruled. The decision in Astron Clinica Ltd and others v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks has prompted the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO) to change its approach to patents for computer programs.

I t says it will not appeal against Mr Justice Kitchin’s ruling that patents should be allowed to protect a computer program if the program implements a patentable invention.

The law on patentable subject matter in the field of computer-implemented inventions was substantially reinterpreted by the Court of Appeal in 2006, in Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd and others; Re Macrossan’s Application. Followingthat judgment, UK-IPO concluded that claims to computer programs or to programs on a carrier were not allowable.

However, in Astron, a group of patent applicants successfully argued that if their computer-implemented methods and apparatus were patentable, they should also be able to protect the underlying computer programs themselves. Kitchin J said: “I do not detect anything in the reasoning of the Court of Appeal which suggests that all computer programs are necessarily excluded.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll