header-logo header-logo

Is change ahead?

26 October 2012 / Edward Heaton , Anna Heenan
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Ed Heaton & Anna Heenan consider the Law Commission’s consultation on matrimonial property, needs & agreements

On 11 September 2012, the Law Commission published a consultation paper on Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements. This supplements the Commission’s 2011 consultation on marital property agreements (often known as pre- and post-nups).

The consultation paper requests the views of the public and practitioners alike on two fundamental issues relating to the law of finances on divorce and the dissolution of a civil partnership (although, for ease of reference, this article will only refer to divorce going forward). The issues are as follows:

  • The law relating to financial needs on divorce (and, in particular, the extent of an individual’s ongoing obligation to support their former spouse and the level of that support); and
  • The legal status of “non-matrimonial property” (and, specifically, what constitutes non-matrimonial property and the extent to which such property should be treated separately from property which is the product of the marriage).

Since the consultation paper raises complex issues and the consultation paper itself extends to 123 pages, the scope

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll