header-logo header-logo

26 October 2012 / Edward Heaton , Anna Heenan
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Is change ahead?

Ed Heaton & Anna Heenan consider the Law Commission’s consultation on matrimonial property, needs & agreements

On 11 September 2012, the Law Commission published a consultation paper on Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements. This supplements the Commission’s 2011 consultation on marital property agreements (often known as pre- and post-nups).

The consultation paper requests the views of the public and practitioners alike on two fundamental issues relating to the law of finances on divorce and the dissolution of a civil partnership (although, for ease of reference, this article will only refer to divorce going forward). The issues are as follows:

  • The law relating to financial needs on divorce (and, in particular, the extent of an individual’s ongoing obligation to support their former spouse and the level of that support); and
  • The legal status of “non-matrimonial property” (and, specifically, what constitutes non-matrimonial property and the extent to which such property should be treated separately from property which is the product of the marriage).

Since the consultation paper raises complex issues and the consultation paper itself extends to 123 pages, the scope

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll